Kolhapur Violence: The matter of violence spread after a social media post regarding Aurangzeb in Maharashtra’s Kolhapur is currently calm, but this matter has once again heated up the politics of Maharashtra. The opposition is continuously besieging the Shinde government on this matter and questions are being raised regarding communal violence. Meanwhile, Sanjay Raut, the leader of the Uddhav faction, has once again targeted the Maharashtra government. Sanjay Raut has told the Shinde government responsible for this entire violence.
Sanjay Raut’s answer regarding Aurangzeb
Regarding the Kolhapur violence case, Shiv Sena (Uddhav faction) leader Sanjay Raut said, “The government is responsible for whatever happened in Kolhapur. Riots are taking place in the name of Aurangzeb, whom we buried four hundred years ago. We have only one mindset that he attacked Maharashtra.”
Raut said – Is your Hindutva so weak?
Sanjay Raut had held a press conference regarding Kolhapur. In which he said, “The people of Kolhapur were not involved in this violence, people from outside rioted. I appeal to the Home Minister of the state that if you do not have intelligence, then take information from us, after your government comes to power in this state.” Why are riots taking place in India? If you talk about Hindutva, is your Hindutva so weak that if people posted someone’s photo in a city, then your Hindutva was in danger. It has been many years since Aurangzeb was buried here, Even after all these years, you need Aurangzeb to win elections. Because Bajrangbali didn’t help you in Karnataka.”
In Kolhapur, the police has also started action in the matter of controversy and violence regarding Aurangzeb, many people have been arrested by the police in this matter. At the same time, five youths who posted on social media were also taken into custody. At present, considering the seriousness of the matter, hundreds of police forces have been deployed on the spot.
read this also – Kolhapur Violence: After the uproar in Kolhapur, how is the situation now, the opposition raised questions on the whole pattern of violence
<